Jet-set into savings this Black Friday! ✈️
Snag exclusive travel deals early and turn your wanderlust into a reality ✨🌴
Email: hannah@indulgetravelco.com for details!
#BlackFridayTravel #AdventureAwaits #indulgetravelco #travelready #letstakeatrip #luxurytraveller #traveldeals
Trend Engine: AI-Powered News & Trends
Where AI Meets What's Trending
-
-
I was getting around 40 clicks a day from Bing search, then in May, we suffered a cyber attack with hackers spamming the site, creating multiple pages on the domain.
Now Bing as completely de-indexed us, even though we have since dealt with the problem.
Any advise on how to get us back up?
-
# New study of rats suggests more than 200 types of misfolded proteins could be associated with age-related cognitive decline. Findings could lead to new therapeutic targets and treatments in humans.
-
Now that the Google core update is over…has anyone who saw a drop, recovered at all?
-
Just wondering if anyone else feels this.
After the March 2024 updates, I’ve seen crazy ups and downs. Stuff that used to rank overnight on Medium and similar platforms now barely moves… or gets wiped out in days.Is anyone still getting results with Parasite SEO in 2025? Or is Google officially done letting those pages sit on top?
share your experience, guys.
-
Hey everyone,
I’m working on a project where we have users replying among other things with sounds like:
* **Agreeing:** “hm-hmm”, “mhm”
* **Disagreeing:** “mm-mm”, “uh-uh”
* **Undecided/Thinking:** “hmmmm”, “mmm…”I tested **OpenAI Whisper** and **GPT-4o transcribe**. Both work okay for yes/no, but:
* Sometimes confuse yes and no.
* Especially unreliable with the undecided/thinking sounds (“hmmmm”).Before I go deeper into custom training:
👉 **Does anyone know models, APIs, or setups that handle this kind of sound reliabl**y?
👉 **Anyone tried this before and has learning**s?
Thanks!
-
Lately, I’ve been really disappointed with the review process. There seems to be a recurring pattern in the weaknesses reviewers raise, and it’s frustrating:
1. “No novelty” – even when the paper introduces a new idea that beats the state of the art, just because it reuses components from other fields. No one else has achieved these results or approached the problem in the same way. So why dismiss it as lacking novelty?
2. Misunderstanding the content – reviewers asking questions that are already clearly answered in the paper. It feels like the paper wasn’t read carefully, if at all.
I’m not claiming my paper is perfect—it’s definitely not. But seriously… WTF?