Trend Engine: AI-Powered News & Trends

As title says, Two days ago I was bridging my eth from eclipse chain to base chain using relay link and when I bridged the eth to my metamask wallet, the eth vanished. I checked through blockscan and it showed an internal transaction being made after two seconds of bridging. Is there any way the transaction being made after reversed or are my funds lost forever?

What a time to be alive, you can buy a whole bitcoin for only 118K.

Previous cycles did not have an ETF. Previous cycles didn’t have a President that acquired $1B in btc. Previous cycles didn’t have Wallstreet on board and advisors starting to pitch BTC allocation to their >9 figure AUM ultra high net worth clients.

Realized market cap needs to be \~2T for btc to be valued @ $1MM.

The current global M2 is \~100T, and is projected to double over the 10 years. You’re telling me we’re going to get another $100T of fiat in the world, and you don’t think *at least* another 1T is going into btc?

Given the ETF, given the BTC treasury companies, given that it is now a Wallstreet asset, it is 100% obvious we’re going to get at least another trillion USD into bitcoin over the next 10 years.

H/T dotkruger, Gary Cardone on spaces.

Edit:

Addressing a common misunderstanding in the comments…

***Realized*** **market cap** means the sum of the prices the last time the asset was moved on the blockchain, aka how much fiat people actually paid to buy into the network. The *realized* market cap is $1T.

**The “*****regular*****” Market cap** (normally stated as simply “market cap”) is total value of all the coins that have been mined. It is this sum that sits at 2.3T.

They are different terms and not the same thing.

Edit:

It takes *another* \~$1T over the span of 10 years to move the price to $1MM, *not* 20T.

Because the passage of time or “speed” of investment affects the magnitude of effect on price per dollar invested, if this amount was injected over a shorter time frame, the price would go up even farther.

The $1T/10yr figure was calculated by Fred Kruger, his resume is online… (Standford math PhD, 9 figure net worth, Wallstreet veteran).

It is a *conservative* estimate of what we can expect to transpire, and for those that missed the point (i.e. “bitcoin doesn’t care”), it is highly likely the typical 4 year cycle price action is a thing of the past, this is what happens when you see institutional adoption grows and retail becomes much less of an influence.

I know that more companies are adopting strategies like Microstrategy to accumulate cryptos to gain revenues… now with companies like SharpLink Gaming to accumulate ETH, other companies are doing the same with BNB…

What I do not understand is why they are doing this. I know that it’s for those in traditional finance who do not want to have direct exposure to crypto to hold crypto without actually holding it directly…

But how is that better than holding the crypto directly?

Curious to see how folks think…

How to actually confirm whether an order was filled during backtesting in case the buy order price is exactly at the top of the bid?

Example:
Lets say an asset pair has bid and ask at 0.8001/0.8002 for long time periods; how to know or assume when a buy order at 0.8001 is filled if the price oscillates between them for a prolonged time period?

If this question is due to obvious misunderstandings on my side, please do enlighten me.

Any help on this seemingly obvious beginner question is appreciated.

Ethereum’s path, like any journey, is filled with potential detours and uncertainties. While it may retest the $2,800 support or power through to past the $4,200 resistance, the only sure thing is the learning you’ll gain along the way. Keep your ear to the ground, your mind open, and your investments informed. Happy trading!

With this roadmap, hopefully navigating the intricacies of Ethereum becomes a bit clearer. It’s not just about numbers; it’s about understanding the story behind them.

This research is an exciting step in the right direction. It opens doors to more questions, like how these findings might vary among different populations or how treatments can be tailored to alleviate these symptoms.

So, while hamsters are still going to squeak and spin on their wheels, their contribution to science, particularly in understanding long COVID, is turning out to be incredibly significant. Let’s keep an eye on how these findings could lead to better care and strategies for handling the long-term impacts of COVID-19.

In sum, the more we learn about COVID’s impact on our brain, the better equipped we’ll be to tackle its lingering effects, ensuring everyone gets back to being their best selves—human or hamster.